Beauty product Home | L'Oreal 'loses' to eBay in the UK

L'Oreal 'loses' to eBay in the UK

22 May 2009

The High Court has ruled that eBay cannot be held legally accountable for the sale of counterfeit goods on its website.

But it has also referred a number of questions to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for clarification.

Facts

L'Oreal has brought proceedings against eBay in several European countries - including the UK, France, Germany, Belgium and Spain - over the sale of counterfeit L'Oreal products on its auction site.

L'Oreal argued that eBay does not do enough to prevent or police the sale of counterfeit goods.

Ruling

Although the ruling states that eBay is not jointly liable for the sale of counterfeit products, interestingly - and in contrast to the French ruling requiring the parties to go to mediation - the High Court has referred a number of questions to the ECJ on the interpretation of the Trade Marks Directive for clarification, such questions yet to be agreed.

However, Mr Justice Arnold has specifically stated that the German version of this case may be wrong; hence the reference to the ECJ.

What eBay could be forced to do
Despite the ruling in eBay's favour, the judgment also states that eBay could police its site better by implementing measures such as:

The judge noted, however, that the fact it was possible for eBay to do more did not necessarily mean it was legally obliged to do it.

It will be interesting to see if any of these suggestions are implemented over the coming months.

What this means?

The ruling effectively means that for the time being brand owners will have to continue the costly and time-consuming practice of policing sites such as eBay for counterfeit goods.

On the positive side, the referral to the ECJ on the interpretation of the Trade Marks Directive should mean that there will soon be a Euro-wide precedent clarifying the position in relation to the sale of counterfeit items via third party hosts.

Increased policing by eBay could therefore be on its way.

What should you do?

Being proactive about trade mark infringement is always better than being reactive, so it is important to consider the following:

© Shoosmiths. This page is for general information: it is not legal advice. Please read our full terms and conditions for details of the disclaimers and exclusions which apply.


Are any of the issues in this article giving you a headache? If so, we want to know

Name *

Comments*

The information you provide here will be used solely for the purposes of responding to your query for more information see our privacy policy.

 

Get in touch

Rachael Parman

Associate
T: 03700 86 8494
I: +44 (0)1908 48 8494
E: rachael.parman@shoosmiths.co.uk